Michael O'Hanlon, a war-hawk tank thinker with the Brookings Institution who encouraged us to invade Iraq, says we should "remain hopeful" about Afghanistan. Even though the news about Afghanistan has been "dispiriting," O'Hanlon tells us, "Most foreign and Afghan officials and officers who I encountered on a recent weeklong visit sponsored by the U.S. military are guardedly optimistic about our prospects."
That's because the Afghan officials and officers O'Hanlon met to were guardedly selected to feed him a line of bull feathers. Our adventure in Afghanistan is as impossible to justify, or be optimistic about, and the follies conducted there by Alexander the Great and the British and the Soviets.
With Obama's decision on Afghanistan a few days away — it is reported to be 34,000 additional troops — this article does a good job of stating the case against getting ourselves stuck any deeper in this quagmire.
this article does a good job of stating the case against getting ourselves stuck any deeper in this quagmire.
But the question is-- will President Obama actually read it?
Gorbachev was right about Afghanistan
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/stevecoll/2009/09/gorbachev-was-right.html
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |